Controversial journalist, Kemi Olunloyo, has stated that celebrity photographer Busola Dakolo lied about being raped by COZA pastor Biodun Fatoyinbo.
She took to her social media to claim that a lot of the bits of Busola Dakolo’s story don’t add up.
Kemi Olunloyo claimed that Busola’s sister continued attending the church even after the alleged rape.
She also alleged that the Dakolo’s are being paid by a mysterious party to ruin Fatoyinbo.
Kemi Olunloyo also alleged that the relations between Busola Dakolo and Pastor Fatoyinbo was probably consensual and that this has all been an elaborate scheme to fool the Nigerian people.
She said: “A lot of people don’t understand the mathematical aspect of the case with Busola Dakolo and the COZA rape scandal. Busola said at one point that the pastor’s wife called her to come and babysit their daughter. And then the pastor picked her up and they stopped in the bush and he had sex with her… bend her over on top of the bonnet, behind the car. She had these stories of things that didn’t happen. Many of you are saying that “okay he didn’t rape her, it was consensual but still, that’s underaged sex”. But the fact is that it never even happened,”
The controversial journalist also said that the dates for the alleged rape don’t add up.
“Busola lied about it, yes she lied about it. Because if she said she was 17 and that she was picked up by a pastor to go babysit his kid per the pastor’s wife’s phone call, and that the pastor’s wife was told that “I’m I your house girl or what?”. At the same time, this little baby was born in 2002. If Shindara was born in 2002, how could they have called you in 1999, or even in 2000 or 2001 before the baby was born? Busola didn’t add her dates up properly”, she said.
According to her, if the dates are as they should be, Busola would have been over 18 when the sexual encounters occured.
“The pastor and his wife couldn’t have kids. They prayed for kids and three to four years later they had a kid. From 1999 to 2002 should be three years. And even if you went to babysit that child in 2002, you were 19 or 20, you were no longer underage. So this talk about “he sent me over, raped me two or three times”… If somebody raped you in your house, will you follow them to their house to go babysit a child? It didn’t add up Busola, it didn’t add up. But then, the baby wasn’t born till 2002, so let’s forget 1999. In 2002, you should have been possibly 20-years old”,
What do you think? Is this investigative journalism or a biased report?